His latest slogan is "big government is chaos". That's right: at this time of great economic crisis, Thad doesn't believe government is part of the solution, but of the problem. I'm reminded of the old axiom: "I don't want a conservative politician for the same reason I don't want a vegan butcher. He doesn't want to do a good job." He rejects the lessons of the Great Depression, and indeed of all American history, and instead supports a fundamentally laissez faire approach to the crisis.
The one place that Thad has rejected laissez faire and corporate Republicanism is his defense of the auto industry. I must give credit where credit is due: Thad has done a fine job fighting for the auto industry in Washington. He had no choice to, politically, but he still deserves some credit for the way in which he has stood up. What he fails to understand, though, is that the Republicans who opposed the auto-bailout are very consistent ideologically. They oppose any sort of government help in jumpstarting the economy. Thad was smart enough to oppose laissez faire when it came to Detroit, but he has no problem supporting it when it comes to other areas: the stimulus package, the budget, et cetera. That is the fundamental argument against Thad: he is a Republican, who, other than his rhetoric regarding the auto industry, is willing to toe the party line and oppose economic recovery.